ArticleVox sanguinis2026
Cross-sectional survey of the barriers and enablers to preventing iatrogenic anaemia in inpatients with haematological malignancies: The CONSERVE study.
Article in Vox sanguinis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPatients with haematological malignancies are at high risk of anaemia due to disease and treatment factors, making patient blood management (PBM) strategies critical. We aimed to identify the barriers and enablers to implementing the principles of PBM to conserve patients' own blood and reduce the risk of iatrogenic anaemia in inpatients receiving treatment for haematological malignancies. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional study of inpatient clinicians was conducted using a survey. Acute care clinicians (nursing and medical) from two wards that treat haematological malignancies at one hospital were invited to complete an online survey between December 2024 and January 2025. The 31 questions (answered on a 5-point Likert scale) were designed to assess awareness, enablers and barriers related to PBM. The survey was conceptually aligned to the 14 domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework and the six domains of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour Model. Responses were condensed into barrier, neutral and enabler categories, and proportions were calculated.
resultsThe questionnaire was completed by 80 participants (52% response rate), 82% being nurses. Barriers were found in five domains, namely reinforcement, knowledge, behavioural regulation, training and goals. Enablers were found in 10 domains: beliefs about consequences, intentions, role and identity, emotion, skills, environment, social influence, beliefs about capabilities, memory and equipment.
conclusionThis study highlights the barriers and enablers to implementing PBM strategies into inpatient haematology practice. Future implementation studies should address these enablers to assist in overcoming the barriers of implementing PBM strategies in this vulnerable patient cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.