ArticlePoultry science2026
Secondary analysis of the intestinal microbiota of healthy chickens.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intestinal microbiota plays a key role in poultry health and performance. Its composition is influenced by multiple factors such as diet, age, bird type, and housing. The aim of this secondary analysis was to summarize existing data and outline a baseline reference intestinal microbiota that could serve as a reference for future research and industry applications. For this, the intestinal microbiota of chickens across all intestinal segments and feces under standard conditions, without feed additives or infections were compiled and analyzed. A total of 3,562 samples from 79 BioProjects were retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information database, together with their metadata including intestinal segment, bird type, age, housing system, continent, and sequenced hypervariable region. Across all samples, 2,603 unique bacterial genera in 73 phyla were identified, with Firmicutes being the most abundant phylum in all segments. The number of core genera was highest in the ceca, followed by the duodenum. Alpha diversity was highest in the ceca and lowest in feces, as well as highest in Africa and lowest in North America. For beta diversity, Principal Component Analysis revealed a minor overlap among intestinal segments and a major overlap for the other investigated factors. Metabolic pathway predictions revealed 8,674 unique functional orthologs (FOs), with the relative abundance of about 40 to 60% of the FOs constant across intestinal segments and other investigated factors. In conclusion, while microbial community composition may vary substantially between different flocks or production systems, core metabolic functions are often consistent. These findings provide a baseline framework for evaluating how treatments, infections, or management practices may impact the chicken intestinal microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.