Observational studyThe Indian journal of medical research2026
Surveillance and assessment of medical device-associated adverse events in a tertiary care hospital: An observational study.
Observational study in The Indian journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives Medical devices are essential in hospitals for diagnosis and treatment but may also cause unintended adverse events. Materiovigilance plays a crucial role in detecting, reporting, and preventing such events to safeguard patients. This study aimed to monitor, assess, and report medical device-associated adverse events (MDAEs) in a tertiary care hospital and to identify the devices most frequently implicated. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Bengaluru, India, from May 2023 to January 2024. Daily ward rounds were carried out in collaboration with the biomedical team to identify device-related issues. Confirmed MDAEs were documented using the standard reporting forms of the Materiovigilance Programme of India (MvPI). Results Among 1,100 medical devices in use, 31 (2.81%) were associated with adverse events. Most affected patients were females, with an average age of 61 years. Frequently implicated devices included disposable syringes and intravenous (IV) cannulas. The common events included thrombophlebitis, blocked or damaged needles, and elevated serum creatinine following contrast use. Most adverse events involved Class B devices. Causality assessment classified the majority as probable or possible. Interpretation and conclusions The overall frequency medical device associated of adverse events associated was low. However, the findings underscore the importance of continuous device surveillance. Strengthening awareness and structured reporting under MvPI can improve early detection, timely intervention, and long-term patient safety in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.