ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2026
Epidemiology of vaso-occlusive crisis among sickle cell disease patients in India: A community-based multi-centric study.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives Morbidity burden of sickle cell disease (SCD) in India has been underestimated till now due to a lack of nationwide data on the prevalence of clinical outcomes, including the most prevalent clinical manifestations like vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs). This multi-centric study reports the epidemiological characteristics of VOCs among SCD patients in India. Methods This is a prospective, community-based, multi-centre cohort study with fortnightly home visits conducted over 12 months in five SCD-endemic districts of India. A cohort of 252 patients was followed up, and data regarding any illness related to SCD and its management in the previous fortnight were collected using a structured questionnaire. Results Out of the total 252 SCD patients followed up, 223 (88.5%) patients reported 2118 crises in a year [8404 episodes per 1000 patients-year; 95% confidence interval (CI): 8040-8760]. Pain anywhere in the body was the most prevalent symptom [97.3% (n=217) of the participants, with 7 (3-13) median (IQR) episodes per patient in a year]. Among total crisis episodes, 48.7% (n=1031) of the episodes were treated at a health facility. Interpretation and conclusions A higher number of crisis episodes reported among the majority of the patients demystifies the notion that SCD is milder and less severe in India. The lower utilization of healthcare resources among SCD patients raises a serious concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.