ArticleJMIR human factors2026
Dynamic Balance Control and Postural Adaptation in Human-Robot Collaborative Manipulation: Within-Subject Experimental Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The integration of robots into industrial settings has rapidly advanced, aiming to reduce human involvement in demanding tasks while improving overall efficiency. As collaborative robots (cobots) become more prevalent, assessing the physical strain during joint tasks is essential to promote long-term well-being in the workplace. Objective: This study aimed to investigate how human-robot collaboration influences workers' postural control and musculoskeletal load during manipulation tasks performed in parallel. Methods: Fourteen healthy male participants performed manipulation tasks under 3 conditions: without robotic assistance, with a cobot providing load support (Robot Free [RF]) and a cobot constrained to horizontal movement (Robot Plane [RP]). Center of pressure trajectories were computed, and nonlinear recurrence quantification analysis indicators (recurrence rate [REC], determinism [DET], and their ratio) were calculated in the anteroposterior, mediolateral, and anteroposterior-mediolateral planes. Results: Statistical analysis showed greater postural sway in robot-assisted conditions compared to Free. Mean distance increased from 1.7 (SD 0.6) cm in Free to 2.4 (SD 0.6) cm in RF (P<.001) and 2.3 (SD 0.6) cm in RP (P<.001). Mean velocity increased from 2.9 (SD 0.9) cm/s in Free to 4.3 (SD 1.4) cm/s in RF and RP. Confidence ellipse area increased from 7.6 (SD 4.1) cm2 in Free to 24.9 (SD 14.2) cm2 in RF and 23.1 (SD 13.4) cm2 in RP. Sway area increased from 1.5 (SD 0.7) cm2/s in Free to 2.9 (SD 1.2) cm2/s in RF and RP. Nonlinear metrics revealed lower recurrence rates in robot-assisted conditions, decreasing from 0.31 (SD 0.08) in Free to 0.2 (SD 0.08) in RF and 0.2 (SD 0.04) in RP in the anteroposterior-mediolateral plane (P<.001), from 0.33 (SD 0.08) in Free to 0.28 (SD 0.07) in RF (P=.02) and 0.16 (SD 0.03) in RP (P=.007) in the mediolateral direction, and from 0.36 (SD 0.07) in Free to 0.3 (SD 0.06) in RF (P=.009) and 0.26 (SD 0.03) in RP (P<.001) in the anteroposterior direction. Determinism remained stable (values close to 1), leading to higher determinism-to-recurrence ratios for robot-assisted conditions, increasing from 3.41 (SD 0.87) in Free to 5.41 (SD 1.69) in RF and 5.51 (SD 1.11) in RP in the anteroposterior-mediolateral plane (P<.001), from 3.11 (SD 0.63) in Free to 3.64 (SD 0.72) in RF (P=.02) and 3.92 (SD 0.48) in RP (P=.007) in the mediolateral direction, and from 2.82 (SD 0.48) in Free to 3.47 (SD 0.57) in RF (P=.009) and 3.46 (SD 0.45) in RP (P<.001) in the anteroposterior direction. No significant differences were found between the robot-assisted conditions. Conclusions: Interaction increases postural sway, indicating reduced stability and higher physical demand. This could reflect impaired balance or adaptation. Nonlinear analysis reveals that postural control remains structured. Results also suggest that the mere presence of the cobot is the primary driver of these postural changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.