ArticlePloS one2026
Quantification of pulmonary arterial pressure with 4D flow cardiac MRI velocity mapping in patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension: Comparison with right heart catheterization.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectives4D flow MRI is becoming a promising tool to assess pulmonary hypertension which remains a progressive fatal disease. The aim of this study was to compare the quantification of pulmonary arterial pressure derived from 4D flow MRI with right heart catheterization in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
methodsThirty-two patients (22 men, 10 women, mean age 62.6 years old) with known or suspected pulmonary hypertension were enrolled in this prospective study. Subjects were split into two consecutive groups, with the first 22 subjects dedicated to analysis and the last 10 subjects dedicated to validation. All patients underwent right heart catheterization and cardiac MRI examinations. Pulmonary arterial pressures were measured by catheterization. An accelerated kat-arc 4D flow MRI sequence allowed the analysis of cardiac blood and pulmonary artery (PA) flows. Multivariate linear regression models were obtained using stepwise, bottom-up and top-down covariate selection procedures.
resultsUsing right heart catheterization as reference, the multivariate estimates of mean (mPAP) and systolic (sPAP) pulmonary arterial pressures only included 4D flow MRI parameters: mean helicity in right ventricle (RV), mean vorticity in right atrium (RA) and maximum cross-sectional PA area (Amax_PA). The models yielded mPAP = 0.04.Amax_PA + 0.061.mean_helicity_RV - 2.42 (R² = 0.69) and sPAP = 0.066.Amax_PA + 0.134.mean_helicity_RV - 0.613.mean_vorticity_RA + 23.98 (R² = 0.80). Bland-Altman bias were 0.42 and 0.38 mmHg, respectively.
conclusionThis study suggests that kat-arc accelerated 4D flow MRI is a potential non-invasive technique for pulmonary arterial pressure estimation. Therefore, this short-duration sequence could become a useful diagnostic and follow-up exam for patients with pulmonary hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.