ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Treating Chronic Pain by Modulating Phenomenological and Psychophysiological Indices of Self-Transcendence: Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Protocol.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) imposes a significant psychological, physical, and emotional burden on millions of adults in the United States. A challenge in treating CMP is its tendency to become enmeshed with a person's sense of self. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) offer a promising approach to help patients disentangle pain from their sense of self. However, rigorous research is needed to determine which styles of mindfulness practice most effectively promote self-transcendence, a candidate mechanism for durable pain relief. Objective: This study aims to evaluate whether adding direct pointing instruction to traditional mindful breathing enhances self-transcendence and pain relief. We will assess the effects of 2 mindfulness training protocols, mindful breathing (MB) and MB plus direct pointing (DP) instruction, on subjective and neurophysiological markers of self-transcendence and on pain-related outcomes. Methods: In this study, we will conduct a 3-arm randomized controlled trial with 173 adults with CMP, assigned to one of the following groups: (1) 4, 30-minute sessions of traditional mindful breathing instruction, (2) 4, 30-minute sessions of MB+DP instruction, or (3) a waitlist control group. Self-transcendence will be assessed during the first and final intervention sessions using validated self-report measures and psychophysiological indices, including electroencephalography (EEG; theta activity) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS; default mode network [DMN] activity). Primary outcomes include changes in self-transcendence, theta activity, and DMN activity. Additional outcomes include acute pain intensity and pain-related functional interference, measured at baseline through 3-month follow-up. Results: Data collection began in October 2024 and will conclude by May 2027. As this is a protocol paper, no results are yet available. We will report recruitment rates, baseline characteristics, and initial outcome trends in the full trial results paper. Conclusions: This will be the first randomized controlled trial to examine whether direct pointing instruction enhances analgesia by eliciting self-transcendence. Findings may advance understanding of the mechanisms underlying mindfulness-based pain relief and inform the development of more targeted MBIs for chronic pain. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and stakeholder engagement, with potential implications for clinical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.