ArticleBlood advances2026
DNA methylation-based classification of hematolymphoid neoplasms.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MOSAIC: Methylation-Oriented Site Analysis and Information Classifier for Robust Epigenomic Classification of Acute Leukemia in Clinical Cohorts with Variable Tumor Purity.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractAccurate pathologic diagnosis of hematolymphoid neoplasms (HLN) is often challenging because of their complexity and heterogeneity. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling has emerged as a valuable tool for tumor classification and diagnosis across malignancies, such as central nervous system neoplasms. In this study, we explored the role of DNA methylation-based profiling in HLN. We generated the largest crossplatform HLN methylome cohort to date (1156 samples) and identified 44 reproducible methylation classes (MCs) that aligned closely with entities defined by the 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification/the International Consensus Classification (ICC), including subgroups with clinical and biological relevance. Copy number alterations were also inferred for all MCs. Additionally, a machine learning-based DNA methylation classifier was developed and validated on an independent test set, demonstrating a modest 58% high-confidence score rate, nevertheless, with a robust 97% concordance with the original diagnosis in these high-confidence score cases. Additionally, in discrepant high-confidence score cases, although few, the methylation classifier demonstrated its potential utility as an adjunct, in which, on additional review, the diagnosis was revised in favor of the methylation prediction in most of the cases (5/8 discrepant cases). Tumor purity was a significant contributor for a substantial proportion of low-confidence score samples (scores below predetermined thresholds, 42%), affecting the classifier performance (χ2 = 11.7; P< .0008). Our findings suggest that specific hematolymphoid tumor types exhibit distinct methylation signatures that can be leveraged to accurately classify these tumors. As a pilot study, our results provide a foundation for the development of a comprehensive and clinically valuable methylation-based classifier for hematolymphoid tumors in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.