ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Construction and validation of a patient-centered data governance platform for multimodal dental implant data management.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo address the challenge of managing diverse multisource data in dental implantology, this study aimed to construct and validate a patient-centered, time series-based data governance framework. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe established a dental implant time series model and defined a unified dental implantation standard dataset. A MySQL-based governance platform was developed with a user-friendly interface. Usability was evaluated through a within-subject crossover study involving 8 implant dentists performing four representative clinical tasks and comparing the platform against conventional tools, with outcomes measured by task completion time and System Usability Scale (SUS) scores. Additionally, the framework’s utility was assessed through its application in research and education.
resultsThe standard dental implantation dataset contained 715 common data elements for interpreting multisource heterogeneous dental implant data. The dental implant platform allowed users to perform various patient data management tasks, effectively organizing multimodal data along the dental implant time series. Usability testing demonstrated significant efficiency and user satisfaction gains: task completion time decreased by 21.9–38.1% across all the scenarios (P < 0.05), with mean SUS scores of 76.88 ± 4.77, indicating high clinical acceptability. In addition, we explored the research utility of the data in evidence-based epidemiological studies and artificial intelligence applications.
conclusionThis study establishes a validated, standardized framework for clinical data governance that significantly improves clinical data management efficiency and user satisfaction, offering a replicable model for specialty-specific medical data governance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The platform enhances real-world data accessibility providing high-quality structured data to support clinical decision-making, education, and future AI applications in implant dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42024292What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.