ArticleJournal of medical systems2026
Signal Detection Using Change Point Analysis to Identify Safety Signals from Spontaneous Reports in Aortic Stent Grafts in Japan.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Signal detection is essential for identifying potential safety issues with drugs and medical devices. Change point analysis (CPA) detects changes in longitudinal data for a medical device without incorporating comparisons with other devices. This study investigated the temporal relationship between endoleak reports for aortic stent grafts identified using CPA and the issuance of the "Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) Alert for Proper Use of Medical Devices" in Japan. Device malfunction and adverse event reports for aortic stent grafts submitted to the PMDA between April 2008 and September 2022 were analyzed. The reports were mapped to the Medical Device Problem Terminology from the Japan Federation of Medical Devices Associations. CPA was used to identify temporal changes in report counts, with change points having confidence levels ≥ 90% being considered significant. A total of 20,678 reports were analyzed, including 23,541 device malfunctions and 30,500 adverse events. Endoleaks accounted for 10,779 events. CPA identified a significant increase in endoleak events in April 2015 (2 years before the regulatory alert). Confidence levels exceeded 90% in 76 out of 174 evaluated time points, first in July 2008 (9 years before the alert) and next in April 2016 (1 year before the alert). Based on these findings, CPA may help prioritize investigations of medical-device-related malfunctions and adverse events. However, the results do not indicate earlier or superior signal detection relative to regulatory authorities. Further research is needed to assess CPA's applicability to other medical devices and malfunctions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.