Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42024268›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026

Revised Swedish FRAX models and the establishment of age-dependent intervention thresholds.

Kristian F Axelsson, Henrik Litsne, Nicholas C Harvey, John A Kanis, Eugene McCloskey, Helena Johansson, Mattias Lorentzon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristian F AxelssonSahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. kristian.axelsson@gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4118-6038
Henrik LitsneSahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Nicholas C HarveyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
John A KanisCentre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Eugene McCloskeyDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Helena JohanssonSahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mattias LorentzonSahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. mattias.lorentzon@medic.gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0749-1431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a revised FRAX® model for Sweden, derived from recent incidence data on fractures, mortality, and origin of birth, and defined age-dependent intervention thresholds. PURPOSE: Since the development of the Swedish FRAX model in 2008, fracture incidence patterns have changed. The primary aim of this study was to develop a revised FRAX model, based on region of birth, and updated incidences for death and fracture for Sweden. A secondary aim was to define age-dependent intervention thresholds.

methodsBased on national registries, all persons from the age of 40 years living in Sweden between 2005 and 2021 were included. Yearly age- and sex-standardized incidences of hip fracture and major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) were calculated and presented per geographic region of birth. Hip fracture and MOF incidences from 2019 to 2021 were used to create a revised FRAX model for Sweden. Two models, one for Swedish/Nordic-born individuals and one for non-Nordic-born, were developed. The revised FRAX models were compared with the previous FRAX model. Age-specific intervention thresholds were calculated and presented.

resultsCompared with the previous FRAX model, the revised model yielded lower 10-year probabilities of both hip fracture and MOF in men and women. The non-Nordic models showed substantially lower probabilities across all age groups and sexes. Intervention thresholds for MOF without BMD ranged from a 10-year probability of 4.5% at age 40 years to 21.5% at age 70 years and older.

conclusionThe revised FRAX models provide more accurate fracture prediction in Sweden, with lower risk estimates for older people, but due to the introduction of age-dependent intervention thresholds, it is likely that more younger patients will become eligible for treatment in Sweden.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalOsteoporotic FracturesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionAge FactorsFemaleHip FracturesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRisk AssessmentSex DistributionAge-dependent intervention thresholdsFracture risk predicion modelFRAXHip fractureMajor osteoporotic fracture

Identifiers

PMID42024268
PMCPMC13553621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.