Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42024246›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2026

Differentiating ante-mortem from post-mortem findings on fetal and pediatric post-mortem imaging.

Maud P M Tijssen, Aurélie D'hondt, Owen J Arthurs

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maud P M TijssenDepartment of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, Maastricht, AZ, 6202, Netherlands. mpm.tijssen@mumc.nl.
Aurélie D'hondtDepartment of Diagnostics and Interventional Radiology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Owen J ArthursDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interpreting fetal and pediatric post-mortem imaging remains challenging. One of the most important aspects of post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) and post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMRI) image interpretation is to be able to confidently differentiate ante-mortem pathology from the range of normal post-mortem changes that occur. In this article, we discuss the normal post-mortem findings in fetal and pediatric imaging for the central nervous system, thorax, abdomen, and musculoskeletal system, and the limitations of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in post-mortem imaging.

Indexed as

AutopsyFetusPost-mortem imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.