Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42024228›Full record

ReviewNeurotoxicity research2026

From In Vitro Genotoxicity Assays to Human Biomarkers: Interpreting DNA Damage Signals in Long-Term SSRI Therapy through a Translational Neurotoxicology Lens.

Emadeldin M Kamel, Sally Mostafa Khadrawy, Nour Y S Yassin, Noha A Ahmed

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotoxicity research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emadeldin M KamelChemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, 62514, Egypt. emad.abdelhameed@science.bsu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1279-9564
Sally Mostafa KhadrawyDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, 11623, Saudi Arabia.
Nour Y S YassinPhysiology Division, Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, P.O. Box 62521, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Noha A AhmedPhysiology Division, Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, P.O. Box 62521, Beni-Suef, Egypt.

Funding

Imam Mohammed Ibn Saud Islamic University IMSIU-DDRSP2601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are among the most frequently prescribed long-term neuropsychiatric medications, making any potential impact on genomic stability a clinically relevant safety question. Interpreting an SSRI “genotoxicity signal,” however, is challenging because evidence spans heterogeneous endpoints (DNA strand breaks, oxidative base lesions, micronuclei/chromosomal damage, and DNA-damage response markers) and experimental systems with widely different exposure conditions. In this translational review, we synthesize in vitro, in vivo, and human biomarker evidence to clarify what reported DNA-damage findings do—and do not—imply for chronic SSRI therapy. Across cell-based models, several SSRIs can induce oxidative stress–linked DNA-damage endpoints and DNA-damage response activation, but these effects commonly emerge at micromolar concentrations that are supratherapeutic and/or near cytotoxicity thresholds, and their magnitude can vary with metabolic competence and exposure design. Animal studies show mixed outcomes, including endpoint discordance between comet and micronucleus assays and occasional evidence of clastogenic or aneugenic effects under specific dosing regimens, limiting generalization from any single positive finding. Human biomarker studies are the most direct evidence for clinical relevance but remain limited and sensitive to confounding by indication. Available data are more consistent with an absence of a robust, clinically meaningful peripheral-blood genotoxic signal during SSRI therapy, while acknowledging scarce longitudinal follow-up, heterogeneous endpoints, and incomplete control for disease state, lifestyle, and co-medications. We propose an “interpretation ladder” to reconcile discrepancies across evidence streams and outline priorities for future research, including therapeutically relevant exposure modeling (with attention to unbound exposure), standardized reporting and quality practices, and well-controlled multi-endpoint longitudinal cohorts with transparent data sharing.

Indexed as

DNA DamageSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsBiomarkersHumansMutagenicity TestsBiomarkersSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAntidepressant medicinesDNA damageGenotoxicitySelective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.