ReviewIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2026
Cystic neoplasms of pancreas.
Review in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) are increasingly recognized with the widespread use of cross-sectional imaging. They comprise a diverse group including intra-ductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs), serous cystic neoplasms (SCNs), solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) and cystic neuroendocrine tumors (cNETs), each differing in their clinico-pathological features, malignant potential and management. Accurate characterization, using a stepwise approach including high-quality cross-sectional imaging and endoscopic ultrasound with cyst fluid analysis when indicated, is crucial to distinguish high-risk lesions requiring surgery from benign cysts suitable for surveillance. Advances such as molecular testing, micro-forceps biopsy and confocal endomicroscopy have enhanced diagnostic precision. Current international guidelines recommend a risk-stratified approach-resection for main-duct IPMNs, all SPNs and MCNs ≥ 4 cm or with high-risk features, while SCNs and small, stable branch-duct IPMNs may be observed. Indian surgical series demonstrate a younger age at presentation and a higher prevalence of MCN and SPN compared with western cohorts, but a lower rate of malignancy. Surgical resection, preferably in high-volume centres, remains the mainstay for high-risk cysts, whereas endoscopic ablation is emerging for select non-surgical candidates. Guidelines are many in this area with constant evolution, increasing focus on newer diagnostic modalities and post-operative endocrine and exocrine insufficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42024202What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.