Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42024193›Full record

ReviewPlant molecular biology2026

Crop biofortification for global food security: advances in genetic engineering and biotechnological approaches.

Lamiaa M Mahmoud, Nabil Killiny

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Plant molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lamiaa M MahmoudDepartment of Plant Pathology, Citrus Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Road, Lake Alfred, FL, 33850, USA. lamiaa.mahmoud@ufl.edu.
Nabil KillinyDepartment of Plant Pathology, Citrus Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Road, Lake Alfred, FL, 33850, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micronutrient deficiencies, affecting over two billion people worldwide, pose significant health challenges. Recent advancements in biofortification and genetic engineering have shown considerable promise in enhancing the nutritional content of staple crops, thereby improving global nutrition and health outcomes. Biofortification, the process of increasing the nutrient content of crops through conventional breeding techniques and genetic engineering, has expanded the possibilities by enabling precise modifications to enhance nutrient profiles. These technologies have led to crops with increased levels of pigments, iron, zinc, vitamin A, and other critical micronutrients. Despite the potential benefits, several challenges hinder the widespread adoption of biofortified and genetically engineered crops. Regulatory hurdles, consumer acceptance, and socioeconomic factors continue to be significant barriers. Additionally, the long-term environmental impacts and ethical considerations of genetic modifications continue to spark debate. Continued research and collaboration among scientists, policymakers, and stakeholders are essential to overcome these challenges. This review reports the current state of biofortification through genetic engineering, while also addressing the barriers to its adoption. These plant-based solutions can play an essential role in advancing global food security and improving public health.

Indexed as

BiofortificationBiotechnologyCrops, AgriculturalFood SecurityGenetic EngineeringMicronutrientsPlants, Genetically ModifiedMicronutrientsBiofortificationCRISPR/CasFood securityGenetic engineeringMicronutrient deficienciesRNAiTransgene-free plants

Identifiers

PMID42024193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.