Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42024189›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026

Community-centered Care in the Justice System: A Case Study in ACT Adaptation in Rural Communities.

Johanna Thomas, Shaun Thomas, Julie Baldwin, John Eassey, December Maxwell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johanna ThomasUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville, Fayetteville, United States. johannat@uark.edu.
Shaun ThomasUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville, Fayetteville, United States.
Julie BaldwinAmerican University, Washington D.C., United States.
John EasseyAmerican University, Washington D.C., United States.
December MaxwellUniversity of Oklahoma, Norman, United States.

Funding

SAMHSA HHS 1H79SM083302-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental Health Treatment Courts and Assertive Community Treatment offer complimentary solutions for addressing needs of justice-involved individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) and co-occurring disorders (COD). Despite alignment on goals, Mental Health Treatment Courts and Assertive Community Treatment are rarely deployed collaboratively. The current study briefly reviews Mental Health Treatment Courts and Assertive Community Treatment and provides an exploratory case study of how these approaches were integrated and adapted in a rural community during and after the COVID pandemic to serve a surging population with SMI, COD facing unique needs and challenges. Experiences of adapting to challenges to meet the needs of justice involved individuals with SMI and COD provide a positive example for other communities facing similar challenges. In particular, deploying Assertive Community Treatment to full fidelity is not achievable in many communities, fidelity standards may not be universal, and fidelity may not be a necessity for successfully meeting the needs of Mental Health Treatment Court participants. As funding becomes increasingly scarce, this case study highlights the utility of adaptable, place-based solutions that balance fidelity with feasibility.

Indexed as

Assertive Community TreatmentMental Health Treatment CourtRural CommunitiesSerious Mental Illness

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.