ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Seizure freedom as a transitional phase of recovery: rethinking the burden of normality in epilepsy integrating medical and lived perspectives in post-remission care.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond seizure freedom: Reframing recovery in epilepsy.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn epilepsy, seizure freedom is widely regarded as the primary therapeutic endpoint. However, equating recovery with seizure cessation alone may overlook relevant psychological, social, and existential dimensions. The concept of the “burden of normality” describes the disequilibrium that can arise when individuals are expected to resume ordinary life after prolonged illness. We propose framing seizure freedom as the beginning of a transitional phase—analogous to developmental transitions—characterized by identity renegotiation and adjustment to new roles and expectations.
methodsThis paper stems from a multidisciplinary meeting held in Rome (June 2025) involving neurologists, a neuropsychologist, a medical anthropologist, and a patient representative. Through multidisciplinary discussion, participants explored the implications of seizure freedom across biomedical and psychosocial domains. Key themes were identified through qualitative synthesis and translated into practice-oriented considerations.
resultsSeizure freedom was conceptualized not as the end of illness experience but as the onset of a complex recovery phase. Key themes emerged, including: [1] recovery as a multidimensional process extending beyond symptom control; [2] psychosocial challenges, including identity disruption, emotional ambivalence, and relational strain; [3] persistent biological and neuropsychiatric burdens despite seizure control; and [4] gaps in current care models, which rarely address post-remission needs.
conclusionsSeizure freedom should be reframed as the start of a transitional recovery phase. Holistic care strategies and broader outcome measures are needed to support sustained reintegration and long-term well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42024188What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.