ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
The gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus Lilljeborg, 1861) peripheral blood cells: the first morphological and cytochemical study.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Blood cell morphology, ultrastructure and cytochemistry in marine mammals: a narrative comparative review.Veterinary research communications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study provides the first morphological and cytochemical characterization of peripheral blood cells in the gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus). Blood samples were collected post-mortem from 30 wild whales (23 immature, 7 mature; 17 females, 13 males) harvested by Native people of Chukotka (Chukchi and Inuit) during traditional subsistence hunts under Russian-established quotas. Stomach fullness, blubber thickness, entanglement scars, and parasite load were recorded. Leukocyte differential counts showed wide individual variation: band neutrophils, 0–16%; segmented neutrophils, 19–70%; lymphocytes, 17–69%; immature eosinophils, 0–8%; and mature eosinophils, 0–18%. Nucleated red blood cells (nRBCs) were observed in some individuals (up to 15 per 100 leukocytes), as were Howell–Jolly bodies in red blood cells (RBCs) (1–167 per 100 leukocytes) and macrothrombocytes (up to 32 per 100 leukocytes). Cytochemical staining revealed strong glycogen (PAS) positivity in neutrophils, eosinophils, and platelets, and moderate positivity in monocytes. Phospholipid (SBB) staining was strong in eosinophils and variable in neutrophils and monocytes. LUNA and Luxol Fast Blue (LFB) staining were specific to eosinophil granules. Given post-mortem sampling, the absence of absolute cell counts, and the lack of live-animal reference data, these findings should be interpreted as a descriptive morphological baseline rather than indicators of health or disease. This study contributes fundamental data for future comparative research on mysticete hematology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42024172What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.