Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42024163›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026

Optimization of Ki67 digital image analysis in breast cancer by automated tumor area identification.

Paul Jank, Maximilian J Krämer, Michael Untch, Mattea Reinisch, Theresa Link, Albert Grass, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Claus Hanusch, Anne-Sophie Litmeyer, Jens Huober and 13 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Paul JankCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, Department of Gynecology With Breast Center, Berlin, Germany. paul.jank@uni-marburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-0476
Maximilian J KrämerInstitute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Michael UntchHelios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.
Mattea ReinischBreast Unit, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Theresa LinkDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Albert GrassInstitute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Jens-Uwe BlohmerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, Department of Gynecology With Breast Center, Berlin, Germany.
Claus HanuschRotkreuzklinikum Munich, Munich, Germany.
Anne-Sophie LitmeyerInstitute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Jens HuoberHOCH Health Ostschweiz, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Universitäres Lehr-Und ForschungsspitalBrustzentrum, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Dominik GerberPreciPoint GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Christine SolbachBreast Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Vesna Bjelic-RadisicHelios University Clinic Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
Kai SaegerVMscope GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas SchneeweissNational Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kerstin RhiemZentrum Familiärer Brust-Und EierstockkrebsUniversitätsklinikum Köln, Heidelberg, Germany.
Moritz GleitsmannInstitute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Susanne von GerlachInstitute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Bärbel FelderGBG c/o GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Moritz JesinghausInstitute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Carsten DenkertInstitute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany. carsten.denkert@uni-marburg.de.
Sibylle LoiblGBG c/o GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Wolfgang D SchmittCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13GW0207A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate assessment of Ki67, a marker of cellular proliferation, is critical for breast cancer diagnostics and treatment decision-making. This study evaluates an automated Ki67-area identification approach, combined with digital image analysis (DIA) for exact Ki67 quantification. A total of 61 tissue samples from breast cancer patients from two clinical trials (GeparSixto and GeparSepto) were analyzed. The supervised DIA workflow employed automated Ki67-stained tumor area identification, followed by automated Ki67 scoring and was quality-controlled by trained pathologists. Comparisons with manual assessments were conducted to evaluate concordance and scoring precision. The DIA approach identified 232 tumor areas across 61 whole slide images (WSIs). The supervised system demonstrated a high correlation with manual scores (r = 0.78), and improved precision (standard deviation between evaluated tumor areas) was noted in therapy-naïve samples (p < 0.001). While manual assessments predominantly employed stepwise increments (5%), DIA provided finer, more continuous scoring, optimally reflecting the continuous nature of tumor proliferation. Overall, DIA scoring was more robust, with reduced inter-ROI variability and improved reproducibility compared with manual assessment. In conclusion, the study highlights the potential of supervised DIA to enhance Ki67 scoring accuracy and standardization. The methodology's effectiveness in addressing standardized Ki67 scoring suggests its utility in clinical diagnostic workflows. This approach contributes towards improved integration of computational pathology into routine practice for improved breast cancer management.

Indexed as

Breast cancerComputational pathologyKi67

Identifiers

PMID42024163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.