ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2026
Attitudes of older adults toward active euthanasia in advanced Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundActive euthanasia by physicians involves administering a substance that directly causes a patient's death. In Alzheimer's disease, progressive cognitive decline and increasing dependence raise complex ethical and emotional dilemmas. Although legalized in some countries, active euthanasia remains controversial, with public attitudes shaped by multiple factors, particularly in advanced disease stages.ObjectiveThis study examined older adults' attitudes toward active euthanasia in advanced Alzheimer's disease from three perspectives: toward themselves, a family member, and an unknown individual. It also explored associations between sociodemographic and psychosocial variables and these attitudes.MethodsA quantitative study was conducted with 501 individuals aged 75+, recruited through day centers and snowball sampling. Attitudes were measured using hypothetical cases involving euthanasia decisions for oneself, a family member, and an unknown individual. Variables included self-efficacy, will to live, desire to prolong life, life satisfaction, fear of death, social support, and sociodemographic characteristics. Analyses employed mean comparisons and hierarchical linear regression models.ResultsParticipants reported the most favorable attitudes toward euthanasia when considering themselves (M = 3.61), followed by a family member (M = 3.22), with the least favorable attitudes expressed toward an unknown individual (M = 2.86). Lower desire to prolong life and higher self-efficacy predicted more positive attitudes across all cases, while lower will to live was positively associated only in personal and familial contexts. Female gender, higher education, and lower religiosity were linked to more favorable attitudes across all contexts.ConclusionsSociodemographic and personality characteristics should be considered when developing strategies aimed at increasing public awareness of active euthanasia, especially among older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.