ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2026
Cervical Dysplasia Diagnosed in Pregnancy - A Pre- and Postpartum Analysis.
Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Purpose: Cervical lesion regression and persistence rates are notably high. This study aims to analyse postpartum changes in cervical dysplasia diagnosed during pregnancy. Furthermore, the impact of age, tobacco use, and mode of delivery on cervical findings was assessed as the existing data is inconclusive. Methods: This retrospective analysis included pregnant women diagnosed with cervical dysplasia, with complete pre- and postpartum colposcopy, cytology, and histological findings, along with HPV status. Postpartum rates of regression, persistence, and progression were determined and the influence of age, tobacco use, and mode of delivery on cervical preneoplastic lesions was analysed using ordered logistic regression. Results: The study included 102 patients treated between 2010 and 2015 with complete pre- and postpartum cytology and/or biopsy data. Postpartum evaluation showed a regression rate of 45.1%, persistence in 52%, and progression in 2.9%. No significant influence on these rates was observed for age (p = 0.255), tobacco use (p = 0.310), or mode of delivery (p = 0.217). Conclusion: Our findings support the recommended conservative approach of managing cervical lesions during pregnancy which advocates for continuation of the pregnancy with regular monitoring and postpartum surgery if necessary. If invasive cancer can be excluded, the mode of delivery should be based on obstetric criteria, irrespective of cervical findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.