SynthesisAmerican journal of rhinology & allergy2026
Clinical and Molecular Presentation of Respiratory Epithelial Adenomatoid Hamartoma: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in American journal of rhinology & allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundRespiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma (REAH) is a benign tumor-like lesion that appears in the sinonasal tract. Due to the lack of well-defined distinctive features of REAH, specifically clinical and molecular characteristics, this lesion is often misdiagnosed as an inflammatory nasal polyp or sinonasal malignancy.ObjectiveThis study aimed to systematically review the existing literature to determine the distinguishing attributes of REAH.MethodsIn accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a Medline, EMBASE and Web-of-Science literature review was undertaken to evaluate studies published till July 1, 2024. Forest and funnel plots were used to present prevalence and potential small-study effects, respectively. The estimates were calculated using random-effects methodology. The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.