ArticleTrends in hearing
Developmental Trajectories and Influencing Factors of Aural/Oral Performance in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Cochlear Implants Using the PEACH Scale.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The trend of cochlear implantation at a younger age has become increasingly prominent in recent years. However, early intervention also presents significant challenges to postoperative assessment. Parent-reported questionnaires have demonstrated notable advantages in outcome evaluation for infants and young children. In the present study, we investigate the auditory development of Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants (CIs) using the Chinese version of the Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH). A total of 187 children with CIs participated. According to their age at implantation, the children were classified into five groups: <12 months, 13-18 months, 19-24 months, 25-42 months, and >42 months. Evaluations were administered at CIs switch-on (baseline), and at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months post switch-on, resulting in 933 records. We employed a linear mixed-effects model to identify key factors influencing PEACH performance. Results show that the PEACH scores enter a stable plateau phase after approximately 20 months of CI use. Notably, children who received CIs at a younger age exhibited faster improvements in auditory functional performances. This advantage is particularly prominent in children implanted before 18 months of age. Analysis indicated that significant influencing factors include age at implantation, duration of CI use, development quotient, and preoperative residual hearing level. This study explores the longitudinal trends of early aural/oral performance in children with CIs. The findings emphasize the critical importance of early cochlear implantation for improving outcomes while revealing the challenges associated with the late-implanted children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.