Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42023972›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

When the First Pulse Fades: 75% Reduction in Precedence Effect in Cochlear Implanted Rats.

Alexa N Buck, Tim Fleiner, Nicole Rosskothen-Kuhl, Jan Wh Schnupp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexa N BuckDepartment of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong (SAR China).ORCID 0000-0003-0124-9716
Tim FleinerNeurobiological Research Laboratory, Section for Experimental and Clinical Otology, Department of Otolaryngology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-8814-203X
Nicole Rosskothen-KuhlNeurobiological Research Laboratory, Section for Experimental and Clinical Otology, Department of Otolaryngology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4724-5550
Jan Wh SchnuppDepartment of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong (SAR China).ORCID 0000-0002-2604-0057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely known that users of cochlear implants (CIs) often show deficits in binaural hearing. In particular, interaural time difference (ITD) discrimination tends to be substantially worse in CI users. However, only very few studies have investigated how CI stimulation affects the "precedence effect" (PE), and how this might be affected by abnormal hearing experience during development. We performed behavioral experiments to measure temporal weighting functions (TWFs) to quantify the PE in three different cohorts of rats: normally hearing (NH) acoustically stimulated, neonatally deafened (ND) CI-stimulated, and adult deafened (AD) CI-stimulated animals. Lateralization responses were recorded to bursts of eight stimulus pulses in which the ITD of each pulse varied independently, and probit analysis revealed the perceptual weight of each pulse. The NH and ND-CI cohorts were tested at 50, 300, and 900 pps; the AD-CI animals were tested only at 300 pps. The NH animals show a pronounced "onset dominance" at higher pulse rates, that is, the weighting of the first pulse was much larger than for subsequent pulses, exactly as one would expect given previous studies on human listeners. In contrast, the TWFs for the ND-CI and AD-CI animals were much flatter, with a reduction of onset dominance by ∼75%, especially for higher pulse rates. Since neither of our CI cohorts had any experience of reverberation in their electric hearing, we interpret these results to indicate that the PE may require domain-specific experience to develop.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionCochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsDeafnessAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAuditory AcuityBehavior, AnimalDisease Models, AnimalHearingMaleRatsTime Factorscochlear implanthearing experienceprecedence effectspatial hearingtemporal integration

Identifiers

PMID42023972
PMCPMC13121490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.