Trial reportSpine2026
Lumbar Microdiscectomy and Postoperative Activity Restrictions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designSingle-blinded randomised controlled trial.
objectiveTo establish the effect of postoperative mobility restrictions on outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy by comparing sitting and activity restrictions to no restrictions for the first month after surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar microdiscectomy effectively treats lumbar radiculopathy, improving leg pain and functional outcomes. However, 20% of patients experience residual sciatica and 5% require redo discectomy. Persistent sciatica causes suffering, increases health care costs, and results in work absenteeism. While strategies to prevent reherniation include postoperative mobility restriction, evidence is limited regarding efficacy. Most surgeons still advise sitting or lifting restrictions after microdiscectomy.
methodsTwo hundred patients (ages 18-75) undergoing unilateral microdiscectomy were randomised 1:1 to restricted (n=101) or unrestricted (n=99) groups. Restricted patients received limitations on sitting (15-30 mins per two hours), lifting (<5 kg), and strenuous activities for two weeks. Unrestricted patients resumed normal activities as tolerated. All patients wore activity monitors (ActiV8) for one month. Assessments at baseline, day 1, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months included VAS pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index, and quality-of-life questionnaires. The primary outcome was a composite of reduced pain, functional improvement, and absence of further interventions at 12 months.
resultsAt one year, the primary composite outcome showed no significant difference between groups [restricted (41.6%) vs . unrestricted (36.4%), P =0.45]. Secondary outcomes for restricted versus unrestricted groups, respectively, including reherniation rates (10.1% vs . 14.1%, P =0.61), pain measures (VAS back reduction to 23.5 pts vs . 24.5 pts, P =0.83), functional improvements (SF-12 PCS 50.3 vs . 49.7 pts at one year, P =0.57), and reoperation rates (2.9% vs . 5.5%, P =0.68) were similar. Activity monitoring revealed poor adherence to restrictions (10%) with no significant differences in sitting duration or other activities between groups (4102 vs . 4140 mins/wk, P =0.89).
conclusionsLiberalizing postoperative restrictions following lumbar microdiscectomy does not compromise outcomes. These findings support patient-driven recovery guided by comfort rather than rigid restrictions, potentially standardizing care guidelines and facilitating faster return to activities without compromising safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.