Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42023709›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026

Behavioral Phenotyping of Arts Engagement Using 20 Years of the American Time Use Survey.

Jessica K Bone, Feifei Bu, Jill K Sonke, Daisy Fancourt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica K BoneResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London, UK.
Feifei BuResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London, UK.
Jill K SonkeCenter for Arts in Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Daisy FancourtResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Americans for the ArtsBloomberg Philanthropies F024567Dharma Endowment FoundationNational Endowment for the Arts 1936473-38-24Pabst Steinmetz FoundationState of Florida Division of Arts and Culture 24.c.ne.900.834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arts and cultural engagement have been linked to health and wellbeing but there has not been any national monitoring of arts and cultural behaviors in the United States. Given its potential benefits, understanding how engagement is changing is vital. We used the American Time Use Survey (ATUS), a continuous cross-sectional survey (2003-2023) measuring activities during the last 24 h. We estimated rates of arts engagement on an average day; determined how long people spent on the arts; explored with whom activities were done; identified where activities were done; examined potential disparities across different subgroups of the population; and described the time trends in these measures. In this nationally representative sample (n = 236,270), daily arts engagement rates were stable from 2003 to 2023, with small underlying increases in participatory engagement (dancing/performing/arts/crafts/writing) and slight declines in receptive engagement (attending performing arts/museums/watching dancing). There were less consistent trends in time spent on the arts. People increasingly did arts activities alone at home. There were disparities in engagement, with differing trends according to sex, age, and income. To understand population-level engagement, arts behaviors should be monitored nationally. Tracking different activities separately is crucial, alongside the factors influencing participation.

Indexed as

ArtCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesartscultureleisuretrends

Identifiers

PMID42023709
PMCPMC13104588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.