ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2026
Neural Representation of Exogenous and Endogenous Temporal Expectations Based on fMRI.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTemporal expectations are considered as implicit timing, which is different from explicit timing. Furthermore, temporal expectations could be divided into exogenous and endogenous temporal expectations. However, it is still unclear about the neural activation under temporal expectations.
methodsIn the present study, an experimental paradigm was designed for eliciting the related brain activation under exogenous temporal expectations. Three conditions were used for the exogenous temporal expectations task. In order to compare the exogenous temporal expectations related activations to the endogenous', a proper endogenous temporal expectations task was used. Brain activations were obtained by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
resultsExogenous temporal perception-related regions, including TPJ, MTG, thalamus, IFG, caudate, cuneus, SOG, calcarine, FEF, and SPL have a good agreement with previous studies. Furthermore, it shows that the precuneus, PCC, Brodmann area 8 (BA8), ACC, and BA10 were also activated, which overlap with regions of the mesial of the so-called "default mode network". Negative correlated activations to exogenous temporal expectations task (use an endogenous temporal expectations task as an analysis baseline) were also evaluated.
conclusionWe found that the sum of exogenous and endogenous temporal expectations related cerebral regions was almost the same when compared to resting-state networks (RSNs). We propose that the cerebrum could activate in two modes for cognition: one is based on endogenous temporal expectations, and another is based on exogenous temporal expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.