Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42023678›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of botany2026

Ecological niche modeling reveals habitat differentiation and climatic vulnerability in two imperiled, sympatric southern Appalachian carnivorous plants.

Nicholas J Chang, Lauren Eserman, Amanda Carmichael, Adam B Smith, Xingwen Loy, Emily E D Coffey, James Ojascastro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicholas J ChangSoutheastern Center for Conservation, Conservation and Research Department, Atlanta Botanical Garden, 1345 Piedmont Ave. NE, Atlanta, 30309, GA, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-0705-037X
Lauren EsermanSoutheastern Center for Conservation, Conservation and Research Department, Atlanta Botanical Garden, 1345 Piedmont Ave. NE, Atlanta, 30309, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0208-6632
Amanda CarmichaelSoutheastern Center for Conservation, Conservation and Research Department, Atlanta Botanical Garden, 1345 Piedmont Ave. NE, Atlanta, 30309, GA, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-8231-3286
Adam B SmithCenter for Conservation and Sustainable Development, Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Blvd., St. Louis, 63110, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6420-1659
Xingwen LoySoutheastern Center for Conservation, Conservation and Research Department, Atlanta Botanical Garden, 1345 Piedmont Ave. NE, Atlanta, 30309, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4626-6747
Emily E D CoffeySoutheastern Center for Conservation, Conservation and Research Department, Atlanta Botanical Garden, 1345 Piedmont Ave. NE, Atlanta, 30309, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9199-2943
James OjascastroSoutheastern Center for Conservation, Conservation and Research Department, Atlanta Botanical Garden, 1345 Piedmont Ave. NE, Atlanta, 30309, GA, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-2738-1632

Funding

Atlanta Botanical GardenDivision of Biological Infrastructure 2216650University of Minnesota
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premiseUnderstanding the habitat requirements of imperiled flora is critical for informing ex situ conservation practices, designing effective reintroduction strategies, and understanding how climate change will impact such species, especially in montane regions with high levels of environmental heterogeneity. In southern Appalachia, USA, the mountain sweet pitcher plant (Sarracenia rubra subsp. jonesii) and mountain purple pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea var. montana) inhabit overlapping ranges. These taxa rarely co-occur in the same mountain bogs but frequently hybridize at sites where they do co-occur.

methodsWe assessed patterns of climatic niche differentiation in these imperiled taxa to explore whether they naturally co-occur or may have been brought into secondary contact through human translocations. In addition, we constructed ecological niche models to evaluate the comparative availability of suitable habitat for each taxon under present and future climates.

resultsSarracenia purpurea var. montana inhabits higher elevation habitats than Sarracenia rubra subsp. jonesii, and these differences in elevation correspond with differences in climatic niche. Under the most likely future climate scenario, models predicted that habitat matching the climatic niche of Sarracenia rubra subsp. jonesii will decline in area by 95% by 2080, while habitat matching the climatic niche of Sarracenia purpurea var. montana will increase in area by 13%.

conclusionsDespite high spatial overlap, these two related taxa exhibit divergent climatic niches, resulting in highly different management needs and conservation approaches. We raise concerns about the future of mountain bog plant assemblages, and the rare species they include, under climate change.

Indexed as

Carnivorous PlantEcosystemSarraceniaceaeSympatryAppalachian RegionClimateClimate ChangeModels, Biologicalcarnivorous plantsmontane wetlandsniche overlaprare plantsSarraceniaceaespecies distribution modeling

Identifiers

PMID42023678
PMCPMC13206205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.