Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42023480›Full record

ArticleResearch in psychotherapy (Milano)2026

Developing relational competence in psychotherapy training: a qualitative study of trainees' perspectives.

Giovanna Trimoldi, Marco Sambin, Pietro Spataro, Giulia Gagliardini, Irene Messina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in psychotherapy (Milano), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giovanna TrimoldiUniversitas Mercatorum, Rome.
Marco SambinCentro Psicologia Dinamica, Padua.
Pietro SpataroUniversitas Mercatorum, Rome.
Giulia GagliardiniUniversitas Mercatorum, Rome.
Irene MessinaUniversitas Mercatorum, Rome.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relational competence is a key determinant of psychotherapy outcomes, yet its development during training remains insufficiently understood. The present study adopts a qualitative, trainee-centered approach to examine how psychotherapy trainees conceptualize relational competences, evaluate their strengths and limitations, and identify the experiences most influential in their development. Forty-nine trainees from a four-year psychotherapy training program completed a structured interview, and data were analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis. Findings revealed four main themes: i) the conceptualization of relational competence as a foundational and multidimensional component of clinical practice; ii) a predominantly external, patient-driven locus of validation for perceived strengths; iii) the context-dependent and relationally situated nature of perceived limitations; and iv) the central role of experiential learning contexts in fostering relational development. Overall, relational competence emerged as a dynamic and developmental construct, shaped by the integration of personal dispositions, experiential learning, and evolving professional identity. These findings highlight the need for training models that more effectively integrate experiential and reflective components while supporting the development of more internalized standards of professional competence.

Indexed as

psychotherapy trainingqualitative researchRelational competenciestherapeutic relationship

Identifiers

PMID42023480
PMCPMC13158730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.