Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42023479›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026

Machine Learning Meets Pharmacokinetics: A Comparative Analysis of Predictive Models for Plasma Concentration-Time Profiles.

Felix Jost, Clemens Giegerich, Christoph Grebner, Hans Matter, Henrik Cordes

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Felix JostTranslational Medicine Unit, Quantitative Pharmacology, Research Pharmacometrics, Sanofi R&D, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0316-7055
Clemens GiegerichTranslational Medicine Unit, Quantitative Pharmacology, Disease Modeling, Sanofi R&D, Frankfurt, Germany.
Christoph GrebnerIntegrated Drug Discovery, Sanofi R&D, Frankfurt, Germany.
Hans MatterIntegrated Drug Discovery, Sanofi R&D, Frankfurt, Germany.
Henrik CordesTranslational Medicine Unit, Quantitative Pharmacology, Research Pharmacometrics, Sanofi R&D, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0654-3386

Funding

Sanofi
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles from molecular structures represents a significant advancement in pharmaceutical research with substantial implications for expediting drug discovery processes. We evaluated five approaches to systematically compare five distinct methodological frameworks for predicting rat plasma concentration-time profiles directly from molecular structures using a consistent dataset and evaluation framework: (1) NCA-ML, predicted non-compartmental analysis parameters with one compartmental PK modeling; (2) PBPK-ML, utilizing ML-predicted in vitro characteristics in physiologically based PK models; (3) CMT-ML, neural networks predicting compartmental PK model parameters with two or three compartmental PK modeling; (4) CMT-PINN, employing physics-informed neural networks trained on concentration-time profiles predicting compartmental PK model parameters with two or three compartmental PK modeling; and (5) PURE-ML, using decision trees to predict concentration values at specific time points. The CMT-PINN approach achieved highest predictive performance closely followed by PURE-ML (R

Indexed as

Machine LearningModels, BiologicalPharmacokineticsAnimalsDecision TreesNeural Networks, ComputerPharmaceutical PreparationsPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRatsPharmaceutical Preparationscompartmental modelingconcentration‐time profilesdrug discoverymachine learningmolecular structurePBPK (physiologically based pharmacokinetic)pharmacokineticsPINN (physics‐informed neural networks)predictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID42023479
PMCPMC13274745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.