Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42023474›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026

Understanding purchasing patterns of alcoholic, alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks: A latent profile analysis.

Oscar Rousham, Abigail K Stevely, John Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oscar RoushamSheffield Addictions Research Group, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3464-6096
Abigail K StevelySheffield Addictions Research Group, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5637-5245
John HolmesSheffield Addictions Research Group, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-2151

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR135310Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 108903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimAlcohol-free and low-alcohol (no/lo) drinks (≤1.2% ABV) are increasingly popular in high-income countries. Their potential to reduce alcohol-related harm depends on who buys them, in what quantity and their incorporation into overall drinking patterns. We aimed to (1) compare purchases containing only no/lo drinks, only alcoholic drinks or both, over time between 2018 and 2023; (2) identify subgroups with distinct purchasing patterns in 2023; and (3) describe sociodemographic differences between these subgroups.

designLatent profile analysis of cross-sectional household purchasing data.

settingGreat Britain, 2018 and 2023.

participantsNationally representative samples of 30 401 (2018) and 28 254 (2023) households. 4975 households purchasing no/lo drinks in 2023 were included in the latent profile analysis. MEASUREMENTS: Data included off-trade (i.e. shop) purchasing occasions categorised into no/lo-only, alcohol-only or no/lo alongside alcohol. Household characteristics were purchasing frequency, standard servings of no/lo drinks per adult, alcohol risk levels based on weekly units of alcohol purchased per adult (non-drinker: 0 units; low-risk: ≤14 units; increasing risk: >14- ≤ 35 units; high-risk: >35 units; 1 unit = 8 g alcohol), age, social class, region and ethnicity.

findingsFrom 2018 to 2023, the proportion of purchasing occasions that were alcohol-only fell from 97% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 97%-97%] to 95% (95% CI = 95%-95%), while no/lo-only purchases rose from 1.4% (95% CI = 1.3%-1.4%) to 2.7% (95% CI = 2.7%-2.8%) and no/lo alongside alcohol purchases rose from 1.2% (95% CI = 1.2%-1.2%) to 1.9% (95% CI = 1.9%-2.0%). In 2023, no/lo-only purchases were smaller (median = 6.9 no/lo servings) than no/lo alongside alcohol purchases (median = 6.5 plus 24.5 alcohol units) and alcohol-only purchases (median = 24.6 units). No/lo-only purchases occurred earlier in the week, no/lo alongside alcohol purchases peaked on Fridays and Saturdays. Latent profile analysis identified three classes: no/lo triers (53%) averaged 2.1 no/lo servings per adult annually with 95% purchasing no or low-risk levels of alcohol; occasional purchasers (34%) averaged 7.5 servings with 20% purchasing alcohol at increasing or high-risk levels; dual purchasers (13%) averaged 37.8 servings with 39% purchasing alcohol at increasing or high-risk levels. Dual purchasers and occasional purchasers were more likely to be older [60% (P < 0.001) and 54% (P = 0.010) aged ≤55 years, respectively] and white [both 97% (P = 0.014 and P = 0.0074, respectively)] compared with no/lo triers (49% aged ≤55 years, 94% white).

conclusionsIn Great Britain, most households that purchase no/lo drinks appear to do so infrequently and purchase alcohol at low-risk levels; however, a smaller group of older, higher-risk households purchase no/lo drinks more frequently.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesCommerceConsumer BehaviorAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited Kingdomalcoholalcohol‐freelatent profile analysislow‐alcoholpurchasing patternssocio‐economic position

Identifiers

PMID42023474
PMCPMC13357960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.