ArticleActas espanolas de psiquiatria2026
Mental Health Screening in Prison: Psychometric Evaluation of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 Among Incarcerated Men in Mexico.
Article in Actas espanolas de psiquiatria, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPsychometric screening tools for persons in penitentiary centers (PPC) are key to assessing their mental health needs, given the shortage of both time and mental health personnel. Depression and anxiety are among the most prevalent mental health problems in PPC. Inadequate diagnosis can lead to increased symptom severity and even suicide. Therefore, validating instruments to assess depression and anxiety in PPC populations is essential to reduce the risk of misdiagnosis and its consequences.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) in 272 men (>18 years old) deprived of liberty in a penitentiary center in Mexico. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. Concurrent and discriminant validity were assessed using the depression and anxiety scales of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Eleventh Revision (ICD-11) Primary Health Care (PHC). Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were plotted to determine the best cut-off points in both instruments.
resultsBoth the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 showed items that were representative of their underlying constructs and supported the original one-factor structure, with satisfactory goodness-of-fit indices in both exploratory and confirmatory analyses. Both instruments exhibited good internal consistency in the sample of Mexican men incarcerated in penitentiary centers (α = 0.87 and α = 0.89, respectively). Furthermore, both scales showed strong correlations with the ICD-11 PHC depression and anxiety scales, along with adequate sensitivity, specificity, false positive, and false negative rates, resulting in a low misclassification rate.
conclusionsThe PHQ-9 and GAD-7 can be used to briefly and reliably assess depression and anxiety among male PPC in Mexico City and in populations with similar institutional and sociodemographic conditions Given the specific characteristics of PPC populations across different countries, it remains necessary to continue testing these instruments in underrepresented populations to ensure the development of reliable and valid tools that help identify potentially confusing items and minimize diagnostic errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.