ArticleActas espanolas de psiquiatria2026
Development and Validation of Machine Learning-Based Models for Predicting Postoperative Depression Risk in Patients With Ovarian Cancer.
Article in Actas espanolas de psiquiatria, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop machine learning-based prediction models for postoperative depression risk in patients with ovarian cancer and to evaluate their predictive performance and clinical application value.
objectiveTo develop machine learning-based prediction models for postoperative depression risk in patients with ovarian cancer and to evaluate their predictive performance and clinical application value.
resultsAmong 850 patients, 268 (31.5%) were positive for postoperative depression risk. Feature selection identified 13 predictive variables: age, operation time, length of hospital stay, pain score, white blood cell count, albumin, C-reactive protein, CA125, education level, history of depression/anxiety, postoperative insomnia, fatigue, and opioid analgesic use. Among the five models, random forest demonstrated superior performance with an AUC of 0.776 in the validation set, a Brier score of 0.182, sensitivity of 0.771, and an F1 score of 0.792, along with satisfactory calibration and clinical net benefit. SHAP analysis revealed that pain score, postoperative insomnia, albumin level, and opioid use contributed substantially to model predictions. A nomogram based on logistic regression model was constructed for intuitive individual risk assessment.
conclusionThe machine learning-based prediction models for postoperative depression risk in patients with ovarian cancer demonstrated satisfactory discriminative ability and clinical utility, with random forest model showing optimal performance. A clinical nomogram was additionally constructed to enable individualised and visual risk quantification suitable for bedside application. Together, these tools facilitate early identification of high-risk patients and provide evidence for clinical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.