ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
First come, first served: neuronal processing of multi-echo streams in the auditory cortex of echolocating bats.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Echolocating bats emit acoustic pulses that get reflected off objects. The spatial information carried by the echoes enables bats to avoid obstacles in darkness. Usually, every pulse is followed by a cascade of echoes arising from multiple objects. By using echolocation sequences where single pulses are followed by echo cascades, we recently demonstrated that cortical neurons predominantly responded to the leading echo. Responses to lagging echoes from a cascade were suppressed, suggesting that spatial information from the most immediate object is processed at the cortex level. In that study, the leading echo was typically the most intense, leaving it unclear whether the echo selectivity was due to echo order or echo level. Here, we recorded from the auditory cortex of anaesthetized Carollia perspicillata, while stimulating the bats with echolocation sequences that contained echo cascades either with echo levels that were equally intense or where the leading echo was less intense than the lagging ones. Our results demonstrate that the echo level has only minor effects on neural processing and that the echo selectivity is mostly caused by the echo order. These results go in line with the neural time window of sensation hypothesis, proposed by Roverud and Grinnell. Whenever the bat hears a pulse, a neural time window opens, and any subsequent high-frequency signal within the spectral range of that pulse is by default classified as an echo, thereby closing the sensation window. This mechanism renders large parts of the cortex less responsive to distant objects, regardless of the echo intensity they produced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.