ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Evaluation of Routine Clinical Deployment of an Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Assistant for Cataract Follow-Up in the National Health Service.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To understand the efficiency, safety, and patient acceptability of using an artificial intelligence-based conversational agent Dora R2 (Ufonia Limited, UK) in the cataract pathway. Patients and Methods: This mixed methods cohort-based service evaluation included both prospective and retrospective data collection from two UK public hospitals: Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust and Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust. Patients undergoing cataract surgery of mixed complexity were included. All patients who had postoperative calls with Dora R2 between October 2022 and April 2023 were included. Dora R2 calls patients three weeks after routine cataract surgery to assess symptoms and answer patient queries. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were reviewed, and statistical analyses were performed to identify any differences based on age, gender and ethnicity. Results: Of 1580 eligible patients, 1269 (78%) completed the Dora R2 call. About 767 (63%) had "no clinical concerns" identified by Dora. The median patient age was 77 years, with 84% identifying as white. There were no significant differences in call outcomes based on demographic factors (at 5% significance level). The Net Promoter Score for patient acceptability was 47, indicating high satisfaction. Regarding safety, only 0.3% of patients required unplanned management changes within two weeks of a Dora call with a "no concerns identified" outcome. Conclusion: Dora R2 effectively supports postoperative follow-up for cataract surgery, demonstrating high efficiency, safety, and patient acceptability. The technology successfully supports clinicians in identifying uncomplicated cases, reduces the need for clinician-led consultations, and does not exacerbate digital inequalities, showing promise for broader implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.