Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42023357›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2026

Correlation study of indices on health status and social progress among Indian states.

Mosoniro Kriina, Ponnaiah Manickam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mosoniro KriinaDivision of Health Systems Research, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ponnaiah ManickamDivision of Health Systems Research, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The health status of a population is determined by biological, behavioural, environmental, immunological, nutritional, genetic and social factors. Two prominent measures of health status are the Burden of Disease (BoD) and Health Index (HI). Another measure called the Social Progress Index (SPI) reflects the socio-economic status of a nation. We aim to correlate the indices to understand their inter-relationships. Methods: Data were abstracted into MS Excel, tabulated and analysed R. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to correlate SPI and HI. Quantum Geographic Information System (Q-GIS), a free open-source software to analyse, create and map spatial data was used for visualisation. Results: Pearson's correlation coefficient showed a positive relation between SPI and HI. While a negative correlation was found when these two indices were correlated with BoD measures for communicable diseases (death rate and disability-adjusted life year), injuries and a positive correlation is observed with non-communicable diseases. Conclusion: We hypothesise that social progress and health are associated.

Indexed as

Burden of Diseasecorrelation analysisgross domestic productHealth Indexsocial progress

Identifiers

PMID42023357
PMCPMC13098863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.