ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2026
Saudi family physician's clinical inertia of type 2 diabetes management.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The primary aim in effectively managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is to delay or prevent persistent diabetes complications through tailored individual targets, ensuring controlled glycemic levels. While family physicians play a crucial role in managing T2DM; the phenomenon of clinical inertia has emerged as a barrier to achieving optimal patient outcomes. Objective: To assess the prevalence of clinical inertia in the management of T2DM among Saudi family physicians working at primary care centers. Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted among family physicians working at primary care centers in Al Taif city, kingdom of Saudi Arabia utilizing a self-administered questionnaire to collect the data. Results: The study included 264 family physicians. About 31.6% of them were not aware of the term "clinical inertia," while 78.3% were comfortable recommending injectable therapies. Moreover, majority of them (95.4%) were referring to guidelines and treatment algorithms to manage patients with Conclusion: A considerable proportion of family physicians in Saudi Arabia were not aware of the term "clinical inertia." Therefore, to address clinical inertia in managing diabetes, family physicians in Saudi Arabia should receive training to enhance their understanding of clinical inertia and its impact on patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.