ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2026
Pain assessment and management in the emergency department: A prospective quasi-experimental study.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rapid assessment and treatment of pain is crucial when a patient first arrives in the emergency department (ED). Overcrowding and underassessment of pain can lead to inadequate management. There is also a paucity of literature on pain assessment and management practices in EDs. Hence, we decided to conduct a study to do a gap analysis on ongoing pain management practices in the ED and increase adherence to standard international pain management guidelines through a teaching program, with a vision for a "pain-free ED." Methods: This quasi-experimental study examined ED patients with pain. The study was conducted in three phases: pre-training, training, and post-training. Observing the ED pain assessment and management practices was the primary objective. Patient demographics, pain assessment method, door-to-analgesia time, and the analgesic prescribed were recorded, among others. Training of residents and changes in pain management practices were secondary objectives. Result: Two hundred and forty-six patients were recruited in each of the pre-training and post-training phases. Before training, pain assessment was conducted in 19.5% of cases, primarily using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Reassessment was done in only 22% of cases. Median door-to-analgesia time was 46.50 min, interquartile range (20-107). After training, pain assessment significantly improved from 19.5% to 59.8% ( Conclusion: This study highlights deficiencies in current pain management practices in the ED and underscores the necessity for a structured departmental pain protocol. Recommendations include emphasizing pain assessment, documentation, and early prescription of correct analgesics. Positive outcomes in our study underscore the potential benefits of educational initiatives in optimizing pain management in the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.