Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42023311›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2026

Restrategizing health human resources for India's Public Health System.

V Sayvithaa Shalini, Girish N Rao, B N Gangadhar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

V Sayvithaa ShaliniProgram Coordinator, National Mental Health Survey-2 (NMHS-2), National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Girish N RaoProfessor, Department of Epidemiology, Centre for Public Health, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
B N GangadharFormer Chairperson, National Medical Commission (NMC), New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

India's medical education system and healthcare workforce are at a crossroads. Despite significant expansion in infrastructure, training capacity, and regulatory reforms, a mismatch persists between medical education outputs and the needs of India's diverse and primarily rural population. The system remains heavily hospital-centric, often underpreparing graduates for outpatient and community-based roles, particularly in the context of rising noncommunicable diseases and chronic care needs. This article traces the historical evolution of India's medical education, critiques the limitations of current approaches, and argues for a strategic realignment toward competency-based, community-embedded, and generalist-oriented training. Key challenges including rural-urban workforce imbalance, limited postgraduate training in family medicine, undervaluation of general practice, and poor transition support for medical graduates are examined alongside policy shifts and emerging opportunities. The authors propose a transformative framework ("PRIME") that integrates rural service with academic incentives, strengthens field-based learning infrastructure, and envisions a Virtual National University for Family Medicine. Such reforms are vital for cultivating a health workforce that is not only clinically competent but also socially responsive, capable of navigating the complexities of a rapidly evolving public health landscape in India.

Indexed as

Delivery of health careEducationgeneral practitionersGraduatehealth care reformhealth resourcesMedical

Identifiers

PMID42023311
PMCPMC13098848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.