Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42023295›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in food science2026

Integrating human biomonitoring into food safety risk assessment: Advances, challenges, and future perspectives.

Caiting Bu, Daoyuan Yang, Haixia Sui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caiting BuChina National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, PR China.
Daoyuan YangNHC Key Laboratory of Food Safety Risk Assessment, China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, Beijing, 100022, PR China.
Haixia SuiNHC Key Laboratory of Food Safety Risk Assessment, China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, Beijing, 100022, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human biomonitoring (HBM) is a vital tool for evaluating internal exposure to chemicals and their metabolites. It provides a direct reflection of the cumulative body burden from various sources and pathways. Although extensive data has been generated through numerous projects, linking these findings to health risks remains challenging. This review emphasises the importance of HBM in risk assessment and explains how to interpret biomonitoring data. Through concrete examples, including national case studies from Singapore and China and chemical-specific assessments of pesticides and mixtures, we demonstrate the practical application of HBM in food safety. The strengths and limitations of the HBM approach, as well as its future directions, are discussed in detail.

Indexed as

Biomonitoring equivalentsFood safetyHuman biomonitoringInterpretation of biomonitoring dataPhysiologically based toxicokineticsRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID42023295
PMCPMC13098502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.