ArticleJournal of migration and health2026
Work-active ageing or healthy worker selection? Late-life employment and happiness among older migrants in Europe.
Article in Journal of migration and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Policies promoting work-active ageing assume that extending working lives improves later-life well-being. Among migrants, late-life employment is shaped by migration-related selection and labour-market stratification, which may inflate associations with work well-being. We test whether an apparent work-active immigrant paradox (older migrants appearing both more likely to remain in paid work and more likely to report higher happiness) reflects benefits of work or selection into employment and residence. Methods: We analysed cross-sectional data from the European Social Survey Round 11 (2023/24), including 12,989 adults aged ≥65 years (847 foreign-born; 12,142 native-born). Paid work was defined as respondents' main activity in the last 7 days; happiness was measured on a 0-10 scale. We estimated naïve linear regression models and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) models to balance workers and non-workers with respect to pre-exposure demographic, socioeconomic, and health indicators (age, gender, education, partnership status, financial strain, self-rated health, and health limitations/conditions). Extreme weights were trimmed at the 99th percentile, and post-weight balance was assessed using standardised mean differences and a Love plot. We also tested effect modification by migration status using an interaction term (Paid work and migrant status) and ran a migrant-only sensitivity analysis. Results: Older migrants were more likely than native-born respondents to report paid work (11.0 % vs. 6.6 %) and reported higher mean happiness (7.54 vs. 7.18). In naïve models, paid work was associated with higher happiness (β = 0.33, 95 % CI 0.21-0.45). After IPTW adjustment, the work-happiness association attenuated to a small, non-significant estimate (β = 0.06, 95 % CI: -0.09-0.22). The migrant advantage in happiness persisted in IPTW models (β = 0.45, 95 % CI 0.21-0.69). Conclusions: In later life, the apparent well-being benefits of paid work largely reflect selection on measured health and demographic factors, consistent with healthy-worker selection. The migrant happiness advantage is not explained by employment participation. Population health strategies should prioritise health protection and the quality and voluntariness of later-life work, alongside broader supports for inclusion and security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.