Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42023274›Full record

ReviewNeuroprotection (Chichester, England)2026

Regulatory B cells in the central nervous system: From immune regulation to neuroprotection.

Luiza Stanaszek, Miroslaw Janowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroprotection (Chichester, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luiza StanaszekNeuroRepair Department, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw Poland.
Miroslaw JanowskiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine University of Maryland Marlene Baltimore MD USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5261-7975

Funding

Hyperpolarized 13C metabolic imaging in an endovascular swine model of ischemic strokeR21NS133531 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI JANOWSKI, MIROSLAW, MAYER, DIRK · 2023 to 2024
$425k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS133531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review examines the immunoregulatory functions of interleukin-10 (IL-10)-secreting regulatory B cells (Bregs), specifically focusing on their potential neuroprotective roles and therapeutic implications for central nervous system (CNS) disorders. We conducted a narrative review of the current literature to evaluate the defining characteristics, mechanisms of action, and functional significance of Bregs. We specifically analyzed their roles in modulating immune responses within the CNS following injury and in neurodegenerative contexts. Bregs are a distinct immunosuppressive B cell subset that operates primarily via IL-10 secretion. Their functions include suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokine production and directing T cell differentiation toward regulatory phenotypes. In CNS pathologies, evidence suggests that Bregs can infiltrate the blood-brain barrier following disruption. Once within the CNS, they exert neuroprotection and enhance neuronal survival, thereby mitigating post-injury inflammation. Bregs are essential to immune regulation with significant, although not fully elucidated, neuroprotective potential. Their ability to modulate CNS makes them viable therapeutic targets for the treatment of brain injuries and neurodegenerative diseases. However, clinical applications must consider the complexities of B-cell biology to avoid compromising immune homeostasis. Further research into Breg mechanisms is vital for developing safe, targeted therapies.

Indexed as

BregsCNS injurydemyelinating diseasesinflammationneurodegenerationstroke

Identifiers

PMID42023274
PMCPMC13097514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.