ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
B cells in anti-tRNA synthetase syndrome patients show an activated, interferon-responsive signature.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The diagnostic value of autoantibodies together with the clinical utility of B cell-depleting therapies (e.g., rituximab) highlight a pathologic role for B cells in antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS). Mainstays of therapy however rely on broadly immunosuppressive agents, which often lead to incomplete treatment response. We therefore set out to identify dysregulated pathways in ASyS as novel therapeutic targets. Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear nuclear cells were isolated from ASyS and healthy participants. Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed on flow sorted CD19+ cells, followed by differential gene expression and pathway analysis. Results: ASyS patients upregulated pathways related to either interferon or cellular stress (activated B cells) and interferon, actin, or chemical stress (memory B cells), with increased reactive oxygen species identified in several memory B cell subsets in ASyS participants. The frequency of memory B cells expressing the stress response gene, FKBP5 or lipid membrane raft organization gene, MYADM was higher in ASyS patients versus healthy controls. Pathway analysis of these memory subsets showed altered actin/cytoskeleton rearrangement, cellular stress response, and cellular metabolism (FKBP5+ memory) and altered antigen processing/presentation, cellular adhesion, and cell homing (MYADM+ memory) in ASyS. Discussion: Overall, our data identify novel and known gene expression changes within activated and memory B cells. These data implicate activated and memory B cell rewiring in ASyS that may support their ability to act as antigen-presenting cells. Future studies will be required to validate these findings and probe their utility as new targets to limit tissue damage in ASyS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.