Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42023108›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Precision and pitfalls: evolving role of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in Orthopedic perioperative pathway-a perspective.

Rui-Tao Li, Wei-Rong Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rui-Tao LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Yulin, Yulin, China.
Wei-Rong RenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Yulin, Yulin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) has become an integral part of enhanced recovery protocols in orthopedic surgery, advancing from landmark-based methods to image-guided precision. Yet its broad implementation and comprehensive integration into perioperative care remain challenging. This perspective article argues that while UGRA improves anatomical targeting, intraoperative stability, and postoperative recovery, it also introduces specific risks related to technique, judgment, and complications. A structured, evidence-informed framework is therefore needed to maximize its benefits while proactively mitigating these risks. By scrutinizing current evidence and clinical experience, this article presents a multi-level analysis spanning diverse surgical settings-from trauma to elective procedures-and explores emerging directions in technology, training, and outcomes research. In summary, we propose a "precision with prudence" approach that combines standardized protocols with individualized care. Strengthening multidisciplinary coordination and perioperative continuity can help transform UGRA from a procedural skill into a central element of patient-centered recovery, ultimately improving functional outcomes and long-term quality of life after orthopedic surgery.

Indexed as

enhanced recovery after surgerymultimodal analgesiaorthopedic surgerypatient outcomeperioperative careultrasound-guided regional anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID42023108
PMCPMC13095673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.