ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Application of deep learning-clinical baseline feature fusion model to predict postoperative mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture: a multicenter study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A large number of studies have focused on building different models to predict postoperative mortality in elderly patients with hip fractures, including sarcopenia risk factor models or deep learning models. However, relying on deep learning models alone may not fully capture the key factors that affect patient outcomes, so it may be a more accurate model to construct predictive models combining clinical baseline features. Methods: A deep learning model (Densenet161) and a deep learning-clinical baseline feature fusion model (LightGBM) were constructed using 221 patients from Institution 1 as the internal training set and 113 from Institution 2 as the external validation set, respectively. We selected the skeletal muscle tissue image of the 12th thoracic vertebral cross section in the chest CT (computerized tomography) scan as the input data of the Densenet161 model. The model's predictive performance was evaluated using AUC (area under the curve), sensitivity, specificity, and F1 scores. Results: The Densenet161 model has an average performance in predicting 1-year postoperative mortality in elderly patients with hip fractures, with an AUC of 0.723 and an F1 score of 0.421 on the external validation set. Compared with Densenet161 model, the predictive performance of LightGBM fusion model has been greatly improved, with AUC of 0.815 and F1 score of 0.819 on the external validation set. Conclusion: Combining the image features extracted by the deep learning model with the patient's clinical baseline characteristics, the LightGBM fusion model can better predict the 1-year mortality of elderly hip fracture patients than relying on a single deep learning model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.