ReviewBone reports2026
Demystifying machine learning approaches in digital bone imaging using microCT and HRpQCT.
Review in Bone reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in bone research.Bone reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Micro-computed tomography (microCT) and high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) generate three-dimensional digital images capturing bone structure and quality. Radiomic analytical approaches applied to these images extract quantitative measures of bone microarchitecture (e.g., bone volume and density). Automating and interpreting radiomics data using conventional image analysis techniques (e.g., bone segmentation) and statistical approaches is often inadequate due to their limited capacity to accommodate complex, nonlinear relationships. These limitations are especially apparent in bone research when integrating imaging outcomes with results from complementary analytical methods (e.g., biomechanics and histology) and experimental factors (e.g., clinical data). Machine learning (ML) offers opportunities in bone research by leveraging powerful computational tools; for example, to enhance bone spatial resolution, accelerate digital image segmentation, and reveal hidden patterns and relationships within high-dimensional bone data. Insights into key ML model inputs, which may be interpreted as primary biological phenotypes or therapeutic targets, can be revealed using standard (i.e., parametric and non-parametric analyses) or advanced statistical methods (i.e., dimensionality reduction and data integration). Overall, this narrative review has three main objectives: (1) to introduce current applications of ML in preclinical and clinical bone research using microCT and HRpQCT; (2) synthesize the interconnectedness of the field of bone and machine learning through user-friendly scientometric and bibliometric analyses and visualization using our novel software called SciNetX; and (3) to provide an accessible, high-level understanding of how ML models are developed and interpreted. These elements aim to provide a foundational guide to incorporating ML into bone research using digital imaging techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.