ArticleBone reports2026
Bone turnover in postmenopausal women during denosumab treatment: Biomarker analysis in naive and discontinuing patients.
Article in Bone reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The recent progression of extracellular vesicles application in osteoporosis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Osteoporosis is characterized by an imbalance in bone turnover, with increased resorption over formation. Antiresorptive treatment, such as denosumab (Dmab), aims to restore this balance, making monitoring of bone turnover markers useful. Key bone resorption parameters are serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and urinary deoxypyridinoline/creatinine (DPD). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the bone turnover in a total of 96 postmenopausal women, 59 were treatment-naive before starting with Dmab, and 37 had discontinued prior Dmab therapy for ≥9 months before resumption. Bone turnover markers were measured every 6 months, and DXA scans were performed annually over 36 months. Comparative analysis included only treatment-naive patients with elevated baseline resorption markers (CTX or DPD above reference). Additionally, a large laboratory database ( Results: Both CTX and DPD decreased significantly within 6 months of Dmab initiation. Notably, while CTX was increased only in 5.1%, DPD was elevated in 32.2% in the treatment-naive group. At baseline, 26.3% of patients in the discontinued group showed elevated CTX levels, while DPD was elevated in all patients (100%). After resuming Dmab treatment following a treatment discontinuation, DPD remained elevated in 51.8% of patients despite normal CTX. Correlation analysis revealed a moderate association between CTX and DPD (r Conclusions: Our data suggest that urinary DPD may provide additional biochemical information in certain clinical contexts, particularly after denosumab discontinuation. Thus, simultaneous assessment of CTX and DPD may enhance diagnostic accuracy and may guide individualized osteoporosis management; however, prospective validation is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.