ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Standardized Protocols for Soil Fauna Extraction and a Call for Cross-Lab Implementation.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the status and global trends of soil invertebrate diversity requires accurate and comparable data across geographical regions. However, soil animal extraction approaches still vary among laboratories, and no commonly accepted, openly available and well-documented protocols exist across taxa. Here, we present harmonized methodologies, assembled by an international group of experts, for extracting soil- and litter-inhabiting nematodes, enchytraeids, microarthropods, and larger invertebrates. Illustrated with images and videos, the protocols include advice for overcoming the most frequently encountered issues ('expert tips') for maximizing extraction efficiency and reproducibility. In addition, we provide results from two pilot experiments that test certain steps in nematode and large invertebrate extractions. We show that using two layers of milk filters instead of one in wet extraction of nematodes yields very similar extraction efficiency and has little effect on the sample cleanliness. Further, we demonstrate that on average 31.3% of large soil animals (body length 3 mm and longer) are overlooked during hand sorting but were captured by heat extraction of the sorted samples across three geographically distinct laboratories. Observed differences among the laboratories call for standardized tests of extraction efficiency of large soil animals across regions and research groups. Overall, we provide openly available expert protocols for assessing soil animal taxa in ecological studies worldwide, ultimately facilitating comparisons for a better understanding of the distribution and dynamics of soil biodiversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.