Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022916›Full record

ArticleDialogues in health2026

Person, Provider, Practice and Policy-P4: A framework for two-way learning and aboriginal community-led health promotion and evaluation.

Tracy McRae, Janella Isaac, Juli Coffin, Jonathan R Carapetis, Roz Walker, Asha C Bowen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dialogues in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tracy McRaeSchool of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Janella IsaacArdyaloon Community, Kimberley, WA, Australia.
Juli CoffinNgangk Yira Institute For Change, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Jonathan R CarapetisSchool of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Roz WalkerNgangk Yira Institute For Change, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Asha C BowenSchool of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in Aboriginal communities starts where the community is at and works collaboratively and culturally responsively to the priorities and rhythms of the communities. The See Treat Prevent (SToP) Trial is the first clinical study to incorporate a holistic approach to reducing skin infections. This approach enabled the worldviews of Aboriginal people at the local community level to govern the empowerment approach underpinning the co-design of healthy skin resources and an evaluation framework. This manuscript reports the process of working on Country with Aboriginal communities to facilitate the restoration of Indigenous knowledge systems that have historically been excluded from health research, programs and policies. Methods: Yarning methodology was a approach for embedding Aboriginal worldviews within the Person, Provider, Practice and Policy (P4) evaluation framework showing the bi-directional interrelationships between community members, providers, and policies that affect health and wellbeing of Aboriginal people at the local community level. Importantly, the P4 model is a practical framework for considering the impact of policy and distance in real-world circumstances. Conclusion: Addressing the high prevalence of skin infections in Aboriginal children living in Kimberley communities requires empowerment approaches to include the voices of Aboriginal people living on Country. Doing so should not be a universal approach but a specific approach embedding local community culture and context to enable self-determination for Aboriginal communities. Health interventions that do not allow for transparency between community interrelationships will be difficult to implement or capture the important system inequities that often go unnoticed. It is anticipated that P4 can provide real opportunities for understanding health behaviours, not only at the Person level but also at the Provider, Practice and Policy levels to influence change.

Indexed as

Aboriginal healthEvaluationHealth promotionTwo-way learning partnerships

Identifiers

PMID42022916
PMCPMC13098600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.