Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022908›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Unlocking bone repair in osteoporosis by targeting the angiogenic niche.

Min Chen, Jing Wang, Jiao Wei, Huirong Feng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Min ChenDepartment of Upper Limbs, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Upper Limbs, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Jiao WeiDepartment of Upper Limbs, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Huirong FengDepartment of Upper Limbs, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis (OP) and its related fragility fractures represent a significant global health burden, primarily characterized by reduced bone mass, deteriorated microarchitecture, and compromised self-repair capacity. While current mainstream therapies focusing on anti-resorption and anabolic pathways can slow bone loss, they often fall short in reversing established skeletal deficits and, particularly, in facilitating fracture healing. Growing evidence underscores that angiogenesis is fundamentally coupled with osteogenesis, forming the cornerstone of bone homeostasis and injury repair. However, developing therapeutic strategies targeting this "vascular-bone" axis remains a relatively nascent and underexplored area in the clinical management of both systemic osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. This review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of dual strategies targeting angiogenesis for the treatment of systemic osteoporosis and the enhancement of osteoporotic fracture healing. We first analyze the pivotal role and regulatory networks of angiogenesis in maintaining bone homeostasis and within the fracture repair microenvironment. Subsequently, we systematically categorize and critically evaluate various intervention strategies based on this approach, including mesenchymal stem cells and their exosomes with paracrine functions, phytochemicals and traditional Chinese medicine compounds possessing dual regulatory activities, non-coding RNAs (miRNAs, lncRNAs, circRNAs) that modulate key signaling pathways, proteins or peptides with defined pro-angiogenic activity, repurposed clinical drugs with potential vascular-modulating properties, and non-invasive physical therapies. The article further compares and contrasts the application of these strategies for systemic bone mass restoration versus localized fracture repair, discussing differences in delivery methods, molecular targets, and expected outcomes. Finally, we address the current challenges in the field-such as target specificity, translational barriers, and the lack of robust clinical evidence-and outline future research directions. By integrating existing knowledge, this review seeks to provide a theoretical foundation and novel perspectives for developing next-generation, synergistic therapies centered on vascular regeneration, designed to concurrently improve bone mineral density and bone quality.

Indexed as

Fracture HealingNeovascularization, PhysiologicOsteoporosisAnimalsHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteogenesisangiogenesisangiogenesis-osteogenic couplingosteoporosistherapeutic strategyVEGF

Identifiers

PMID42022908
PMCPMC13095600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.